ATLANTA - Georgia appears to have dodged the financial problems that forced other states to balance budgets with deep cuts and higher taxes, but top money-managers aren't breaking out the champagne yet. <br>
<br>
Final figures are expected to show that Georgia ended the 2001-2002 budget year this weekend in the black, as required by law, and without dipping into its reserves. <br>
<br>
Sitting in an office stuffed with charts, financial reports and predictions about future growth, Henry Thomassen - the governor's chief economic adviser - continues to worry. ``Do we dare count on a recovery that's strong enough to push us up?'' <br>
<br>
Like many states, Georgia watched tax collections sag month after month. As of a few weeks ago, Georgia's collections were down $674 million from the year before. <br>
<br>
By dipping into a surplus accumulated in the previous year, using debt rather than cash for a school construction program and forcing state agencies to cut spending, Georgia was able to offset the most troublesome effects of the national downturn. <br>
<br>
Thomassen says there will even be a modest surplus when the books are finally closed on the year. <br>
<br>
That will help finance the new budget that runs from July 1 to next June 30, but when that expires there is no expectation of leftover funds to help finance the next spending plan. <br>
<br>
``If the rate of growth in revenue isn't as rapid as the expenditure, the gap still gets wider,'' he said. <br>
<br>
That means when legislators come back to the Capitol in January to write the budget for next year, they could be facing a much more complicated problem - one that involves both slow or little revenue growth as well as rising costs in areas like the state's Medicaid program of health care for the poor. <br>
<br>
``Health care costs are increasing right now at about four times the rate of other costs. We cannot continue at that rate,'' said Bill Tomlinson, the governor's chief budget aide. ``If supply and demand begin to meet, we have to slow down the demand, the curve. That's going to be the challenge.'' <br>
<br>
At this point, Democratic Gov. Roy Barnes, who faces a Republican re-election challenge in November, has gotten high marks for managing state government during the recession. Moodys Investor Services, a bond rating agency, again gave the state a triple-A rating - its highest - in April, citing ``the state's history of conservative fiscal management.'' <br>
<br>
``I would say he was dealt a difficult hand and played it relatively well,'' agreed economist Jeffrey Humphreys, director of the University of Georgia's Selig Center for Economic Growth. ``And I didn't even vote for the guy (in the 1998 primary),'' he added. <br>
<br>
But some Republicans wonder if in choosing the budget strategies he followed this year, Barnes merely postponed the state's day of reckoning until after the Nov. 5 election. <br>
<br>
``Roy Barnes has been so political that I think a lot of people just suspect everything of being political,'' said Rep. Lynn Westmoreland of Sharpsburg, the House Republican leader. ``Yeah, he could be saving the hard stuff 'til after his re-election.'' <br>
<br>
Rep. Larry Walker of Perry, the House Democratic Leader, disagreed. <br>
<br>
``On the state level, we did exactly what people do in their personal lives. When things were good, they try to save money so they'll have a little cushion in hard times. I think it's remarkable how well we've done. If we'd had to cut the budget, the Republicans would say, `You're not managing the budget right.' You can't win with them.''